Safety of recreational scooters

      by Michael Paine  5 Dec 2001.

      Extract from the report "ANALYSIS OF RELATIVE SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF BICYCLES AND SCOOTERS" Prepared by Vehicle Design and Research Pty Limited
      for VicRoads 3 January 2001. Supplementary report.

      Executive Summary

      A range of bicycles and recreational scooters have been evaluated using performance tests that were developed for bicycles. These tests revealed that, in general, scooters (motorised and human-powered) are less stable and controllable than bicycles and, in particular, are more susceptible to road irregularities. Sudden falls sideways into the path of passing cars are more likely than with bicycles. Theoretical analysis of stability and reaction to bumps supports this finding and suggests that instability would become worse at higher speeds than those involved in the tests. There do not appear to be any ways to significantly improve the design of scooters to increase their stability at higher speeds.

      Consideration of the human factors issues revealed that recreational scooters require near-continuous monitoring of the state of the vehicle by the rider, due mainly to the lack of force feedback through the handlebars. This raises a serious dilemma when the vehicle mixes with other traffic - particularly cars - because the rider must choose between monitoring the scooter and monitoring other traffic. In contrast, bicycle riders can take a second or two to look around because they feel feedback through the handlebars. There is therefore a fundamental limitation to the ability of recreational scooters to mix with other road traffic. The problem is compounded by the vulnerability of scooter riders to injury in collisions with cars.

      In the case of motorised scooters, it was found that they typically travel too fast to safely mix with pedestrian traffic. On level ground non-motorised scooters cannot be ridden at such speeds for sustained periods. They are still a hazard, however, in pedestrian areas that are congested or have frail or very young people.

      It is recommended that:
        a) recreational scooters not be permitted on any public roads where cars are likely to travel at more than 40km/h (impacts above this speed are much more likely to be fatal - Paine and Coxon 2000)
        b) recreational scooters not be permitted in general pedestrian areas that are congested or usually have frail or very young people.
        c) local councils be encouraged to set up suitable facilities for riding scooters, skateboards and similar recreational devices.
        d) helmet wearing be encouraged for all scooter riders
        e) motorised recreational scooters not be permitted on any public roads, footpaths or pedestrian areas.
        f) motorised bicycles (200 W power limit) continue to be permitted to operate on public roads but a maximum speed (on level ground under power) also be specified to discourage tampering with power limiting mechanisms and to aid enforcement.

      Links

      • 14 Jun 05 Vicroads: Motorised scooters - fine $818!
      • 16 Mar 05 USA Today: 'Pocket bikes' drive new debate.
      • New York legal advice about motorised devices - Operating any of these devices on any street or highway or other area, such as a parking lot open to public motor vehicle traffic, may result in arrest
      • Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Research Page
      • NHTSA Index of Bike Safety Documents.
      • 22 Sep 03 NYT: Scooters, Long a Nuisance, Draw Anger as a Safety Risk
      • Assessment of Pedestrian Protection Afforded by Vehicles in Australia - Paine and Coxon 2000

      Road Safety Web Links